Give now
Coalition for Marriage Launched

CARE has joined with a number of faith-based and secular groups to participate in and launch the Coalition for Marriage.

The Coalition for Marriage (C4M) is an umbrella body representing faith groups, MPs, peers, academics, lawyers, pro-family organisations and grassroots supporters in the UK that support traditional marriage and oppose any plans to redefine it.

As the Coalition for Marriage was launched this morning (20 February), a new survey from ComRes shows that 51 per cent of people agree that “no one has the right to redefine marriage for the rest of us”, given that same-sex couples can secure all the legal rights of marriage by entering into civil partnerships.

The survey of 1002 people conducted in England between January 6 and 8, 2012 also found that 86 per cent of people support the proposition that it is “possible to be tolerant of the rights of others and protective of traditional marriage at the same time”.

The ComRes poll results align with those in the 2008 British Social Attitudes Survey, which found 63 per cent of the public oppose same-sex marriage when respondents are told about the existence of civil partnerships.

Prominent supporters of the Coalition for Marriage campaign include Lord Carey of Clifton, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, and Lord Brennan QC who spoke at the launch this morning.

Lord Carey said that institution of marriage would be weakened by making it available to same-sex couples. “The British public hold marriage in great affection. Most of our young people aspire to be married.

“I believe the general public will oppose the present attempt fundamentally to alter marriage. This is not because we oppose protections and benefits to gay couples, but because we simply don’t accept the mantra of the equalities industry that being equal means being the same.

“Civil partnerships were brought in to give same-sex couples the rights that they argued were badly needed. These rights were virtually identical to those of married couples. Yet at the time I remember listening to government reassurances in the House of Lords that civil partnerships would have no effect on marriage. Marriage, we were told, would remain distinct because it is a relationship between a man and a woman.

“Now the Government – egged on by pressure groups and image advisors, but not the general public – is pressing ahead with plans to rewrite the legal definition of marriage.

“This is in spite of the fact, that for thousands of years it has meant one man committing himself to one woman in the hope of raising children in a stable and loving environment.

“Under the Government’s plans marriage is set to become all about the human rights of adults. The traditional meaning of marriage, which David Cameron rejects, is about the mutual good of both adults and their children. The best interests of children will, I predict, get lost in a cacophony of noise about “equality” and “human rights”.

Legal expert Lord Brennan QC said before the launch: “For centuries our law has reflected the universal reality that marriage is the exclusive, life-long union of one man and one woman. It is unnecessary to be contemplating re-defining this ancient and revered institution. Surely the Government has much more pressing issues on which to focus its energies?

“Same-sex couples have all the legal rights they need in the form of civil partnerships. But if marriage is re-defined, many others will begin to lose their rights, especially the churches, who, whatever reassurances the Government may offer, will be challenged again and again in the courts for refusing to solemnise same-sex marriages.”

Colin Hart, Campaign Director of C4M, branded the proposed changes unnecessary, costly, undemocratic and lacking public support. He said that they were being driven by the forces of political correctness and a handful of single-issue pressure groups.

“When the public are given the facts, when they are told that the rights of marriage are already available through civil partnerships, a majority of the public back traditional marriage.”

C4M is posing a series of questions that it says the Government has so far failed to answer, including the cost, the impact on schools and churches and the legal ramifications.

“The word “marriage” appears 3,258 times in UK legislation. It is woven into the fabric of our national laws. That can’t be just unpicked in a single stroke,” said Mr Hart.

“If the law is changed there is great concern that people will be punished in their careers, charities closed down, or couples preventing from fostering all because of their views on traditional marriage.”

C4M is also arguing that the Government is acting undemocratically since this profound change in the nature of marriage was omitted from the manifestos of all three main political parties.

“The Home Secretary has made clear that the Government consultation will be about “how” not “whether” to redefine marriage and the Prime Minister says it is not a question of “If” but “when. When will the 24 million married people in this country get to have their say? This is profoundly anti-democratic. The Government is running away from this public debate. They are bulldozing ahead without any thought for the consequences,” continued Mr Hart.

“Redefining marriage affects all of us, because it weakens the status of traditional marriage, which provides the most stable environment for raising children. Just one in eleven married couples split by the time of their child’s fifth birthday compared to one in three of cohabiting couples. 97 per cent of couples who stick together until their children reach adulthood are married.”

CARE is glad to be supporting this vital and timely campaign and encourage you to visit the Coalition for Marriage website – – to add your name to the petition which can be found there, download a petition sheet for others to sign and find out more about the campaign. You can also follow the Coalition for Marriage on twitter @c4mtweets.

You can keep up-to-date with CARE’s involvement in the Coalition for Marriage campaign at


1. The Coalition for Marriage (C4M) is a UK-based alliance bringing together both secular and faith-based groups and individuals who oppose attempts to redefine marriage to include both same sex couples and polygamy.

2. The Coalition was launched on the 20th February in London at an event attended by the former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey.

3. C4M has launched a national petition for marriage. Signatories include:  Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Fiona Bruce MP, David Burrowes MP, Edward Leigh MP, Joe Benton MP, Jim Dobbin MP, Sharon James,  Lord Stoddart of Swindon, Rt Revd Peter Foster, Bishop of Chester, Rt Revd Anthony Priddis, Bishop of Hereford, Rt Revd Michael Langrish, Bishop of Exeter, Rt Revd James Newcome, Bishop of Carlisle, Dr Philip Giddings, James Bogle, Chairman of the Catholic Union, Revd Hugh Palmer, Prof Sir Denis Pereira Gray, Revd William Taylor and Revd Martin Turner.

C4M’s petition is open to anyone resident in the UK over the age of 16 and can be signed by visiting  

4. The poll was conducted by ComRes, which interviewed 1002 adults in England by telephone between 6th and 8th January 2012. Data were weighted to be demographically representative of all adults in England. ComRes is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.


  1. Feb 21, 2012
    3:40 pm

    Marcia F Clarke

    Thank you so much for this campaign. I watched Sharon James and Peter Tatchell. Sharon did well, but may I suggest that when the campaign gets airplay that the spokesperson see it aa an opportunity to educate people about the campaign and putting the campaign out there. Towards the end it was a discussion/debate between the two of them, it told the public no more about the campaign which to my mind needs as much publicity as possible. Unfortuneately right now I am living in the States but I have posted the C4M information on my UK friends pages. Thanks again for this great effort.

  2. Feb 21, 2012
    5:25 pm

    Mary Reid

    Thank God, thank God, thank God. How long will we sit and be force-fed this filth, by bullies in the media and strategic positions of authority. The scripture clearly states in Romans 1 about homosexuals. Genesis is clear about the union of marriage between 1 man and 1 woman. It is blessed by God and they were told to multiply. Marriage and family is God’s first choice, and this should be upheld boldly by both Christians and the general public who uphold these morals. We can be silent no longer. Faith without works is DEAD. What would Jesus do? We are imitators of Christ, so lets imitate. Remember the money changers in the house of prayer and what Jesus did? We must stop being scared of this and deal with it head on. We are in the last days, what are we doing?

  3. Feb 22, 2012
    12:46 am

    desmond Connors

    I would love to sign your petition, but although I am a British born citizen,I have resided in Australia for 57 years.
    However, I am with you all the way. We have SSM bills going through our Parliament at present, and pray we may resist the pressure to conform.
    Keep up the good work

  4. Feb 22, 2012
    8:34 pm

    Jamie Bull

    Before you know it we’ll be bashing each other’s heads in with clubs, huddled round a smouldering heaps of jealously-hoarded Daily Mails for warmth if these pinko lefties get their way.

    • Feb 28, 2012
      3:56 pm

      Georgia Rakusen

      Love it :)

  5. Feb 23, 2012
    10:58 am

    A M Hunter

    In Scotland see

  6. Feb 24, 2012
    8:04 pm

    michael clark

    I’m sorry to see that this seems to take no account of the Marriage Foundation launched by Sir Paul Coleridge two weeks ago at the National Relationships conference attended and supported by a number of Christian and other charities supporting marriage. We can ill-afford to have two similar and parallel initiatives -please work together and co-operate on this.

  7. Feb 26, 2012
    3:33 am

    Steve Martin

    I’ve written a piece on this…

    I chose to sign this petition instead…

  8. Feb 27, 2012
    2:45 pm

    Robert Hyatt

    If Muslim clerics were commenting on this issue would they not refer to Mohammed and to the Koran’s teaching. Why are we Christians so shy about referring to Jesus and the teaching of the bible? After all they are really the basis for our objection and and our authority in this and every other matter.
    Let us speak clearly as from God, who gave mankind marriage as recordeed in Genesis 2.24 which was upheld by Jesus in Matthew 19.5., and who created the bodies of men and women for pro-creation, one-flesh relationship and the best relationship for the nurturing of children. None of these is true of same-sex unions. Furthermore, it is a relationship which Paul in Ephesians 5 tells us most perfectly illustrates God’s intimate relationship with people who are joined to Christ by faith. Marriage of a man and a woman is different to a Civil Partnership of people of the same sex and deserves another name.

  9. Feb 28, 2012
    10:55 am

    M Reeve

    When reading about this subject in the Press I never saw any reference to civil partnerships. I wonder why?!

  10. Mar 12, 2012
    9:48 pm

    Tim Fox

    As a Christian I am not in favour of redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships but I have yet to see a non-biblical reason to convince a secular government.
    We say it will undermine marriage – how? What do we see happening and where is the data to back up our arguement?
    I remember reading in Laurie Lee’s ‘Cider with Rosie’ how when registry weddings were introduced in the 1920s his local church (and I suspect this was the national church’s view) condemned them. Yet now the church recognises that a secular marriage vow is as valid as one given in church.
    If we are to convince the Government we need good arguements and hard facts (A.M. Hunters Link above is a good start)

  11. Mar 14, 2012
    10:03 am


    I have no religious preference. In fact i don’t believe any of it. But surely if you believe God created everything then he created homosexuallity? People don’t choose who they are attracted too, its all in our DNA, so why cant you just get on with your own lives and let people live how they wish? It seems utterly ridiculous that me and a man that also does not believe in christianity can get married in a church but two men/woman who are devout christians can’t. Also the research in this article can not have been taken from a fair sample of the country because i do not know one person thats against gay marriage. Its arrogance like this that cause people to become depressed and take their own lives.

  12. Mar 18, 2012
    9:29 pm

    J Dean

    I have read this with interest but cannot agree with this. Does every married couple have children? Does every married couple love each other and keep their vows? Does every married couple stay faithful and cherish their commitment? Same sex couples feel the same as ‘straight’ people and commit to each other the same. They can have children and bring them up happily and safely. They are human beings who are just as religious as anyone else and should have the opportunity to be married and have their love and commitment overlooked by God. Do you think God would really have a problem with this? God who is supposed to love everyone equally? I wouldn’t like to think of God as this judgmental. Can someone explain to me how this would undermine marriage and why “people would be punished in their careers, charities would close down, or couples would be prevented from fostering”?

  13. Apr 4, 2012
    10:01 pm


    God said many things in the bible including this: “Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day shall be put to death.” Exodus 31:12-15 (ESV)
    Does this mean we should go out on the Sabbath and kill everyone who is working, including doctors, nurses, policemen, firemen etc etc? He actually also said we should kill gay people (Leviticus 20:13). Marriage, as we know it, is only about 450 years old. It has changed over the years in our culture and has had many different forms in different cultures. It’s not set in stone at all. I have been married for 41 years very happily and see no reason why my gay friends shouldn’t have the same opportunity.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

Further Info